This might sound very abstract, but its actually all about intensities of experience. One of the main messages of the documentary is that even the smallest act can trigger a change in the way people think. We live toward the future transindividually, in excess over our personhood. Connecting this to the rise of Donald Trump in the United States, how can we make sense of this phenomenon, especially in terms of the liberation of prejudice? How can a mere part resist such a foundational whole? This acknowledges that violence is not reducible to the punctual acts that bring it to full expression in bodily aggression. It is practiced as an offensive sport, or better, a war-machine ever on the attack, rather than in self-defense. You really shouldnt miss. By what criterion is there an identity or sameness between a billionaire born into wealth and privilege and a middle American in the Rust Belt with the fear of God in them about falling into poverty (if they are not already in it)? This is the traditional theory of political leadership based on identification with a charismatic figure.
Critical judgment is not enough. After you find the Power Violence tickets you desire, you can buy your seats from our safe and secure checkout. When you think about it, reacting is just a contrary way of being constrained by what you are reacting against.
His obsession with Twitter and cable TV makes him a single-body media node. The Trump-figure is an affective converter of power-to into a contagion of power-over disseminating through the social field a one-man epidemic of reaction-formation. The very first" in the film sets the mood for the discussion: Throughout the history of mankind, people have been fighting for their rights. He receives with a shudder waves of social and political static, and no sooner sends them back out with a Twitter spasm, in a self-perpetuating cycle. It is not foundational. But from an affect philosophy perspective, the concept of structural violence is questionable.
Nuclear Power Safety
E.C. Report - School Violence
Decreasing Power of the Catholic Church